The End of One-Size-Fits-All
AI has broken the economics that made businesses bend to their software. The companies that notice first will pull ahead.
Every enterprise software deal ends the same way. The vendor demos a product built for a thousand companies. The buyer signs. Then, quietly, the business starts bending: renaming its processes to match the vendor's vocabulary, adding steps because the workflow demands them, hiring people whose whole job is working around the system.
I've watched it for twenty years, up close. In state government, where teams reshaped how they worked around whatever their systems could handle. In insurance, where quoting a policy took ten minutes because ten minutes was what the platform allowed; it took Lean process work and a rebuilt portal to get it to three. In construction technology, where the workflows that actually made money (credit, insurance, logistics) lived outside the software entirely, in phone calls and PDFs. The software never quite fit, and the business always paid the difference.
We accepted this because the economics gave us no choice. Custom software was a luxury. Building something shaped to one company's actual workflow took years and millions, so we bought the closest thing off the shelf and absorbed the friction. One-size-fits-all was never a design philosophy. It was a cost constraint.
That constraint is collapsing.
AI has changed what a small team can build. The systems I drove to production in the last few years, an image-recognition tool that grew an equipment catalog twentyfold and a model that read live data off the machines to predict breakdowns, were software shaped to one company's equipment, one company's data, one company's day-to-day reality. None of it existed on a vendor's price list. All of it went live.
A caution, learned the Lean way: technology applied to a broken process just makes the mess move faster. The order still matters. Map the workflow. Take out the waste. Then build to what remains. AI lowers the cost of building. It does not lower the cost of building the wrong thing.
But when the process is sound, the old tradeoff is gone. You no longer choose between software that fits and software you can afford. The companies that see this early will stop contorting themselves around their vendors and start compounding: every workflow a little more their own, every system a little closer to how the work actually happens.
One-size-fits-all software had a good run. It was the sensible answer to a world where software was expensive to build. That world is ending.
The fit is the product now.